No results were found for your search query.
Reviews 1 - 5 of 20
-
-
-
October 2009
Review summary of Fuji FinePix Z3
By alaTest
Review summary: alaTest has collected and analyzed 147 reviews of Fuji FinePix Z3 from international magazines and websites.
Verdict: The average review rating is 7.9/10. Comparing these reviews to 540866 other Digital Compact Cameras reviews gives this product an overall alaScore™ 87/100 (or 8.7 out of 10) = Very Good Quality.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
July 2007
Fujifilm Finepix Z3
By Soham Raninga
Review summary: With umpteen features and good image quality, the Z3 from Fujifilm is a slick shooter.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
March 2007
Fujifilm Finepix Z3
By Shayne Rana
Review summary: An ultra-compact digi-cam, worth the price?
Pros: Ultra Compact, Good colors, no pin-cushioning
Cons: Too expensive, Pictures too grainy, Cradle required for charging
Verdict: There are plenty of cameras to choose from that fall in a lower price range with features that may not match the Z3 exactly but are as good as. Bottom Line - it's a Point and Shoot camera. At Rs. 13,500 it ain't worth it.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
February 2007
Fuji Finepix Z3 Video Guide
By Supreme Software
Review summary: 3 minute video guide to the Fuji Finpepix Z3. This is a pocket sized digital camera with 5 megapixels and a 3x optical zoom lens.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
February 2007
Fuji Finepix Z3
Pros: Simple design
Cons: Outdoor portrait was dull
Verdict: The Fuji Finepix Z3 was a bit of a surprise package to me. It outperformed a number of similar, pocket sized cameras. It is available at a very reasonable price for anyone who is looking for a compact, five megapixel camera.
Read Full Review
Reviews 1 - 1 of 1
-
- Overall Rating:3 out of 5
- Image Quality:3 out of 5
- Durability:4 out of 5
- Ease of Use:5 out of 5
- Quality:4 out of 5
- Value for Money:3 out of 5
- Recommend Product: No
Fujifilm FinePix Z3
By burhan khan (21/03/2007)
- Pros: easy to use, good picture quality under daylight, compact
- Cons: bad picture quality under low light
image quality is very bad under low light
Read Full Review »
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful